Mag vs. Battle Field Bad Company demo

you know what's sad when a free demo proves more entertaining then a 60 dollar incredibly hyped game. MAG (massively atrocious game) promised gigantic epic battles, but ultimately turned out to be an average PS3 shooter. I call it a PS3 shooter not because it is exclusive to the PS3, but because it reminds me to much of another similar game resistance two another underwhelming game. They both have boring levels, guns, and average graphics. Now granted I have not actually entered a 256 man battle yet so maybe that ONE game mode could change my entire opinion, but when I look at it the fact that I have not been aloud to play that mode is what annoys me the most. For you see you have to level up to access new game modes which would be okay if they were fun, but sadly they are not, so spending time leveling up is less of a fun diversion and more of a chore. Now the BFBC 2 demo by comparison is great it gives me a LARGE map something MAG had also failed to grasp, Vehicles another thing MAG didn't seem to think of (granted I did see a tank in one game mode), and a destructible enviroment, I can not penalize MAG for excluding that, but it still would of been a good descision on their part. And this was only a demo with one level, and you know I was playing a game in MAG with around 100 people and I felt the mere 60 in BFBC. were more present and noticeable. Still I have only played so much of MAG, so I can not really say it's that bad, although on the other hand books and movies can get better, but video games should be entertaining from the very start especially an online exclusive first person shooter. So you know what fuck MAG.